Table of Apple Cultivar Susceptibility to the Cedar-apple Rust Fungus
Gymnosporangium juniperi-virginianae  


Table of apple cultivar susceptibility to the cedar-apple rust fungus
(Source of information and credits provided at the bottom of the page.)
Caution: There may be cultivar variability in susceptibility to cedar apple rust due to geographic location.

Apple cultivar Cedar apple rust
susceptibility ratingz
Apple cultivar Cedar apple rust
susceptibility ratingz
Ambrosia HS Mollies Delicious VR
Arkansas Black R Monroe S
Arlet HS Mutsu S
Baldwin VR Niagara R
Barry R Northern Spy S
Beacon S Northwestern Greening S
Ben Davis S Orin S
Braeburn HS Paulared R
Britemac R Prima HS
Burgundy S Pink Lady S
Cameo HS Pinova HS
Carroll R Princess HS
Chinook HS Priscilla R
Cortland S Pristine S
Crimson Crisp HS Puritan R
Creston HS Quinte S
Dayton R Raritan S
Delblush VR Redfree VR
Delicious VR Rhode Island Greening S
Early McIntosh R Rome Beauty HS
Empire R Runkel VR
Enterprise VR Sansa VR
Fortune R Scarlet O'Hara HS
Fuji HS Scotia R
Gala HS Senshu S
Gala Supreme VR September Wonder S
Ginger Gold HS Shizuka HS
Gloster S Spartan R
Golden Delicious HS Spigold HS
Golden Supreme R Spijon S
GoldRush HS Stark Bounty S
Granny Smith R Stark Splendor S
Gravenstein Holly VR Starkspur Earliblaze R
Grimes Golden R Stayman S
Hampshire VR Summerred HS
Honeycrisp S Suncrisp R
Idared S Sundance VR
Jamba S Sunrise S
Jerseymac VR Twenty Ounce HS
Jonafree S Viking R
Jonagold S Wayne S
Jonamac R Wealthy HS
Jonathan HS Williams Pride S
Julyred S Winesap R
Liberty VR Winter Banana HS
Lodi HS Wellington R
Macoun R Yataka S
Maiden Blush R Yellow Transparent R
McIntosh VR York Imperial HS
Milton VR Zestar! VR

zVR = very resistant. No control needed. (Very few cultivars in this category for any disease.)
R = resistant. Control only needed under high disease pressure.
S = susceptible. Control usually needed where disease is prevalent.
HS = highly susceptible. Control always needed where disease is prevalent. These cultivars should receive first priority when control is called for.

Data compiled by K. S. Yoder and A. R. Biggs from personal observations and the following sources:

Management Guide for Low-Input Sustainable Apple Production, A publication of the USDA Northeast LISA Apple Production Project and Cornell University, Rodale Research Center, Rutgers University, University of Massachusetts, and University of Vermont. 1990. (Apple disease managment section by D. A. Rosenberger, Cornell University).

A Grower's Guide to Apple Insects and Diseases in the Southeast. 1993. Alabama Cooperative Extension Service, Auburn University, Circular ANR-838. Ed. J. R. McVay, J. F. Walgenbach, E. J. Sikora, and T. B. Sutton.

Aldwinckle, H. S. 1974. Field susceptibility of 41 cultivars to cedar apple rust and quince rust. Plant Disease Reporter 58:696-699.

Biggs, A. R., Rosenberger, D. A., Yoder, K. S., Kiyomoto, R. K., Cooley, D. R., and Sutton, T. B. 2009. Relative susceptibility of selected apple cultivars cedar apple rust and quince rust. Plant Health Progress doi:xx.xxxx/PHP-2009-xxxx-xx-RS. (in press).